Accessibility statement
This site aims to meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA. Here is what has been tested, what passes, and what we know is imperfect.
Last reviewed 12 September 2026. This statement applies to screenshot-laptop.com.
Standard#
We aim to conform to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level AA. This is the standard referenced by the UK public sector accessibility regulations, the European Accessibility Act, and by courts interpreting the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Current status: we believe the site conforms, on the basis of the testing below. This is a self-assessment, not a third-party audit.
What has been tested#
Automated testing. Every page type is checked with axe-core against the WCAG 2.1 A and AA rule sets plus best-practice rules, at both a 390px phone viewport and a 1280px desktop viewport. The current result is zero violations.
Contrast. Every text colour has been measured against its actual background rather than assumed. Body text is 11.9:1, secondary text 6.1:1, and the quietest label tier 4.8:1 — all above the 4.5:1 required for normal text.
Keyboard. Every interactive element is reachable by keyboard in a logical order, and focus is visibly indicated with a 2px outline that is never removed. A skip link is the first focusable item on every page.
Structure. One <h1> per page with no skipped heading levels, so screen reader users can navigate by heading. Tables use real <th> header cells. Breadcrumbs are marked up as a labelled navigation landmark.
Motion. There is no automatic motion or animation anywhere on the site, and prefers-reduced-motion is honoured.
Zoom and reflow. Content reflows to a single column without horizontal scrolling down to 320px, and remains usable at 200% browser zoom.
Design decisions made for accessibility#
- Colour is never the only signal. Links are underlined, not merely coloured.
- Tables restructure rather than scroll. On narrow screens each row becomes a labelled record, because a horizontally scrolling table is difficult to use with magnification or a screen reader.
- Text, not images of text. Keyboard keys are styled HTML, so they scale, reflow and can be read aloud. Nothing on this site requires you to see an image to get the answer.
- No JavaScript is required. Every page works fully with scripting disabled.
Known limitations#
We would rather state these than claim perfection:
- FAQ sections use native
<details>elements. These are keyboard accessible and announced correctly in current screen readers, but announcement of the expanded state varies between older screen reader and browser combinations. - Key names are abbreviated as manufacturers print them — PrtSc, Fn, Cmd. A screen reader reads these as written, which can sound unclear. The surrounding prose always names the key in full at least once.
- Self-assessment only. No independent accessibility audit has been commissioned. If you need assurance beyond the testing described above, that is a genuine gap.
- Screenshots to be added later will need descriptive alternative text. Any image published without it is a defect — please report it.
Reporting a barrier#
If something here is unusable for you, please tell us at contact@screenshot-laptop.com. Include the page address, what you were trying to do, and the assistive technology and browser you use.
We aim to respond within 5 working days. If a fix will take longer, we will tell you when to expect it, and offer the information in another format in the meantime.
If you are not satisfied with our response#
In the UK, you may contact the Equality Advisory and Support Service. In the EU, your national enforcement body for the European Accessibility Act. In the US, the Department of Justice ADA information line. We would much rather resolve it directly first.
Questions people actually ask
Does the site work without JavaScript?
Yes, completely. The pages are static HTML and CSS, and no content or navigation depends on scripting. The only script tags present carry structured data for search engines, which browsers do not execute.
Can I use the site at 200% zoom or with a screen magnifier?
Yes. Content reflows to a single column with no horizontal scrolling down to a 320px-equivalent width, which is what 200% zoom on a standard laptop display produces. Tables restructure into labelled records rather than scrolling sideways.
Has the site had an independent accessibility audit?
No. The testing described above is automated plus manual self-assessment. That is a real limitation, and it is stated here rather than glossed over.